Legal Opinion
Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 27, 2007No. 07-220CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER*
BRADEN, Judge.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROTESTS AT THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE.1
On October 25, 2005, the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) awarded Plaintiff Contract No. HSHQDC-05-00036 (“Contract”) as a set-aside, pursuant to the Historically Underutilized Business Zone (“HUBZone”) Act, 15 U.S.C. § 657a.2 See AR at 423-31. Under the Contract, Plaintiff provides and operates shuttle buses that transport DHS employees between the agency’s offices and operates sedans, leased by DHS, to transport managers and senior executives. Id.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Reema Consulting Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Castle-Rose, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.