Legal Opinion
Castle-Rose, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 28, 2011No. 11-163CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*520OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, J.
In this post-award bid protest, plaintiff Castle-Rose, Ine. challenges the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (“Corps” or “USACE”) determination that Castle-Rose’s bid responding to solicitation request W912DW-19-R-0045 was received by the government too late to be considered for an award.
The proposal was turned over to the procurement technician at 2:06 p.m. — six minutes after the deadline. Castle-Rose’s proposal was not considered, and the Corps awarded the contract to Advanced Technology Construction Corporation (“Advanced Technology”). Castle-Rose now…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Mvs USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- St Net, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.