Legal Opinion

Rothweiler v. Winton Motor Car Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1916No. 13473PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered March 13, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant Winton Motor Car Company made certain repairs and furnished new tires for an automobile owned by the Waterhouse Sands Company, but held under a conditional sales contract by one Willis Smith. The machine was covered by a chattel mortgage made by a former owner in favor of the respondents. Appellant filed a lien upon the automobile, which it asserts in this action. Thereafter Smith stored the machine with the Franklin Wicks Company. It also asserts a possessory lien for storage and repairs.

Addressing ourselves first to the lien for repairs, we come at once to a consideration of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitch v. ApplegateWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Storms v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Port of Seattle v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Buell v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Loudon v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API