Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Applegate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1901No. 3583PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior .Court, Pierce County. — Hon. James A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

This action was brought under the act of March 6, 1897 (Laws 1897, p. 55), to foreclose eight laborers’ liens upon a saw mill and the land on which it stood. Applegate and wife were the owners of the land described in the complaint, and the defendants Caesar and wife were the assignees of certain mortgages upon the land described, • which mortgages were made to other parties to secure liens by which money was obtained by Applegate and wife, and were recorded prior to the time of the commencement of the work for which the liens were filed, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hitchcock v. NixonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Griffith v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ivall v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Overbeck v. CalliganWashington Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. J. J. Connelly Shoe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. SharplessWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Blumauer v. ClockWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cutler v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API