Legal Opinion

Buell v. McGee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1941No. 28268PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Simpson, J. —

This action was instituted by the appellant to secure a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to foreclose certain delinquent assessments levied by Pend Oreille county diking district No. 3. The trial court refused to grant the writ.

The case comes-to us upon an agreed statement of facts, and the only point relied upon by appellant is that Rem. Rev. Stat., § 4286-1 [P. C. § 1946-50a], does not provide an exclusive remedy for the foreclosure of delinquent diking district assessments, but is merely another method of foreclosure additional to that provided in Rem. Rev. Stat., §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rothweiler v. Winton Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Shomaker v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Paine v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Dept. P.S. v. Nor. Pac. R. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Beach v. Board of AdjustmentWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. City of Tacoma v. CavanaughWashington Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API