Legal Opinion

Kawneer Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 4, 1943No. 44110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLitxletoN, Judge

The facts are stipulated and show, as set forth in findings 16 and 19, that the increased direct and indirect labor costs incurred between July 31, 1933, and the completion of the contracts, under the subcontracts made by the Kawneer Company and the contracts made by the Coleman Bronze Company, and performed by Kawneer after February 28, 1934, were $12,349.77, and that the increased direct and indirect labor costs incurred between July 31, 1933, and February 28, 1934, under the subcontracts made by Kawneer’s *536wholly-owned subsidiary, the Coleman Bronze Company, were $12,304.55, or a total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Kingan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adam v. StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  2. California Ridge Wind Energy LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Hardie-Tynes Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Riethmiller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API