Legal Opinion

Jones v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Removál of causes. Amendment. Before Judge SNEAD. Richmond Superior Court. October Term, 1880. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, as the wife and next, friend of minor children of Thomas Jones, brought their bill in Richmond superior court against Samuel Jones of Richmond county, and Jacob Foreman of Barnwell county, South Carolina, making substantially the following case :

Thomas Jones, the husband and father of complainants, being the owner of a certain house in the city of Augusta, had rented the same to Samuel Jones, yvho applied in 1873 to said Thomas to repair and enlarge the house, which was old and dilapidated. Thomas Jones, the owner, being embarrassed financially, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. LongestSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Kanouse v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Darst v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Johnson v. MonellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1869
  5. Carswell v. SchleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Hammond v. BuchananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API