Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1940No. O-2889Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFliZE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Ii. 8hoppard FublZc Accounts Dear &lx'*Shoppardt RS~: MI&hor‘%$ Ilit the &lCCCpt8IlCO by tihhe--CqwtyTax Collector . Of 8 hX~+'S‘C@OCk for t&LX- ,/- ',QS8xvl the depoeit thereof by / Colleotor &&opting *om bank 8 Cashier~e mount consti- by the taxpayer qcoipt of your lottor of COUXit~ in Janu- the bank closed. 'It appaars that tho Tax Colleotor re- ceivod approximately t&x+Nvo per cent OC the value of the CashUr*s checlt in dividends. 8x0~ wili please advieo tbia department whether tho Tar COllCOtOP or the t&qXayer should bo bold liable for tho…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Smith Roofing & Contracting Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Jones v. ForemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API