Slepin v. Beck
New York Supreme Court
Motion to require the acceptance of a notice of appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
Judgment was recovered in this action against the defendant, who appeared and was represented in the action and upon the trial by an attorney other than the attorney who appears for him upon this motion. After judgment the defendant retained the attorney who now appears for him, and such attorney served a notice of appeal upon the attorney for the plaintiff, who returned it upon the ground that no order of substitution had been entered, which is admittedly the fact. The defendant now moves to require the plaintiff’s attorney to accept service of the notice. There can be no doubt that except…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Commercial Bank v. FoltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Davis v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- M'Laren v. CharrierNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Cruikshank v. GoodwinNew York Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. PenwellMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Gradl v. SaulpaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Uniform Fibrous Talc Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.