M'Laren v. Charrier
New York Court of Chancery
This was an application to dismiss an appeal, from an interlocutor}' order of the vice chancellor of the fourth circuit, for irregularity.
Read the full summary
This was an application to dismiss an appeal, from an interlocutor}' order of the vice chancellor of the fourth circuit, for irregularity. From the affidavits and other papers read upon the motion, it appeared that the parties resided at Saratoga Springs, and that the original bill was filed by a solicitor residing in the city of New-Yorkthat the injunction master of the fourth circuit was the chancery agent of such solicitor, and had on several occasions appeared for him, at his request, upon the argument of motions before the vice chancellor; that such master, and his law partner, had also…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The last bill in this case, whether considered as an original bill, or as a mere bill of supplement for the purpose of bringing new matters which have arisen since the filing of the original bill before the court, or as an original bill in the nature of a supplementary suit, is but a continuation of the proceedings originally commenced, so far as regards the right of the master to approve of the appeal bond. Whether the complainant is obliged to employ his former solicitor in filing a supplemental bill, or whether the presenting a petition in the name of a new solicitor, and…
2Cited by12 opinions
- People v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Shirley v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Ambler v. HookerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Tampa Street Railway & Power Co. v. Tampa Suburban RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Gilmore v. HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1849
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.