Legal Opinion

Washington Water Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Spokane Tribe of Indians, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 18, 1985No. 83-2051PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Two orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”) hold that the Washington Water Power Company (“Washington Power” or the “Company”) is required by the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (“FPA”), to obtain a license for its hydroelectric development which was completed in 1911 on the Spokane River at Little Falls, Washington. Washington Power claims it constructed, operates, and maintains the dam and associated structures under the authority of a special Act of Congress approved on March 3,1905 (the “1905 Act”), and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Speyer v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta TeamworksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API