Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 1, 2024No. 0:20-cv-00827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation File No. 20-cv-827 (ECT/JFD) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: OPINION AND ORDER ALL ACTIONS ________________________________________________________________________ Peter Kohn and Joseph T. Lukens, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Andrew Kelly, Chris Letter, Dan Chiorean, Stuart Des Roches, and Thomas Maas, Odom & Des Roches, LLC, New Orleans, LA; Andrew C. Curley, Caitlin G. Coslett, and David F. Sorensen, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; E. Michelle Drake, Berger Montague PC, Minneapolis, MN;…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API