Legal Opinion

Ames v. Department of Health

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2009No. 80644-6PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 — Dr. Geoffrey Ames urges reversal of sanctions levied against him by the Washington State Health Department’s Medical Quality Assurance Commission (MQAC) for violations of the medical professional misconduct statute, RCW 18.130.180. MQAC concluded after a hearing that Ames had engaged in unprofessional conduct in violation of RCW 18.130.180(4) and had used an inefficacious device in contravention of RCW 18.130.180(16). Ames contends that no expert testified to the standard of care or that his device was inefficacious. Pet. for Review at 7-8. Ames now asks this court to hold that expert…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Seattle v. FontanillaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Suquamish Tribe v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUNDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Suquamish Tribe v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Seymour v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, DQACCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Karanjah v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API