Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Today we decide whether a warrantless administrative inspection of a dentist’s office not authorized by statute violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches. We conclude that it does and, accordingly, reverse.
I
¶2 A warrantless administrative search is valid only if authorized by a statute that adequately serves as a substitute for the protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. Pursuant to Washington’s Uniform Disciplinary Act (UDA), chapter 18.130 RCW, before a professional disciplining authority such as the Dental Quality Assurance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Dodge City Saloon v. State Liquor ControlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Bradshaw Development, Inc. d/b/a Anytime Fitness v. Dep't of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- Melissa M. Norton v. Washington State Department Of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.