Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance Commission

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 8, 2009No. 61494-1-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 Today we decide whether a warrantless administrative inspection of a dentist’s office not authorized by statute violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches. We conclude that it does and, accordingly, reverse.

I

¶2 A warrantless administrative search is valid only if authorized by a statute that adequately serves as a substitute for the protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. Pursuant to Washington’s Uniform Disciplinary Act (UDA), chapter 18.130 RCW, before a professional disciplining authority such as the Dental Quality Assurance…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  3. Dodge City Saloon v. State Liquor ControlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Bradshaw Development, Inc. d/b/a Anytime Fitness v. Dep't of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
  5. Melissa M. Norton v. Washington State Department Of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API