Cozzi v. Hooksett

On Rehearing. After the foregoing opinion was filed, the plain tiffs moved for a rehearing, and argument was invited on the scope of the motions for a nonsuit and directed verdict.

Murchie, Murchie & Blandin (Mr. Alexander Murchie orally), for the motion. Thorp & Branch (Mr. Branch orally), opposed. Marble, J.

The plaintiffs contend that the decision is based upon an interpretation of the act of 1925 which was suggested for the first time in this court; that the defendant’s right to insist upon a directed verdict is limited to the reasons stated in its motion (Puchlopek v. Company, 82 N. H.…