Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 9, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

It is not the practice in this state to consider questions of law which may not arise when all the facts are found; nor to consider questions sent up in advance of a final determination of the cause in the superior court, when it is evident that a decision thereon cannot aid in the proceedings in that court. Fitzhugh v. Railway, ante, 185.

Upon the present petition for a new trial, the plaintiff’s freedom from fault was found, and an exception to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain that finding was transferred. No order was made, and the essential facts that justice has not been done…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Gray v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Shafmaster v. ShafmasterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. State v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  4. Lamarre v. LamarreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  5. Perley v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API