State v. Isabelle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
A bill of exceptions was allowed at the January term, 1921, of the superior court by Branch, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The ground of the respondent’s exception to the ruling of the court that no disqualification of the juror had been shown, was that an action was pending in the court against one of the jurors in which counsel for the respondent was counsel for the plaintiff. It is provided in section 25 of chapter 209 of the Public Statutes that “any juror may be required by the court, on motion of a party in the cause to be tried, to answer upon oath . . . whether anyone of the counsel in the cause is employed by him in any action then pending in said court. If it appears that any juror is not indifferent,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway of CanadaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Richard v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Bourassa v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Mason v. Dover, Somersworth & Rochester Street Ry.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martineau v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- State v. NiquetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. CassSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. CereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. FournierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.