Root v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
We concur in the reasoning and conclusion of the Court of Appeals, but think it well to add that in order to constitute robbery, it was essential “that the taking should, at the time of manucaption, have been with a larcenous intent.” Kennedy v. State, 208 Ala. 66, 93 So. 822. In other words if the defendants had taken the car merely for use in making their escape, but not with intent to steal it, that is, to appropriate it permanently, then there would have been, no robbery. But under the evidence, as found by the Court of Appeals, we think the question of intent was a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. O'NEALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Etzler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Porter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by21 opinions
- Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Bascom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Parsons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Garrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.