Legal Opinion

CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO. v. Public Service Comm.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 Wis. 212 (1951)

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant,

vs.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 7, 1951.

December 4, 1951.

For the appellant there were briefs by Bender, Trump, McIntyre, Trimborn & Godfrey of Milwaukee, and Aberg, Bell, Blake & Conrad of Madison, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of Milwaukee of counsel, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and William E. Torkelson, chief counsel for the Public Service Commission, and oral argument by Mr. Torkelson.

CURRIE,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Fiske v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Department of Taxation v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
  5. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API