Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The appellant Railroad Company seeks a reversal of the commission’s order for the reasons: (1) That it, is unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record; (2) because the findings, inferences, and conclusions of the commission are contrary to the railroad’s constitutional rights and privileges; and (3) further because they are arbitrary and capricious.
Sec. 227.20 (1), (2), Stats., provides:
“(1) The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury and shall be confined to the record, . . . The court may affirm the decision of the agency, or may reverse or modify it if…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Olson v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council of the City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Hixon v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- In THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION OF NICOLET HS DIST. v. Nicolet Ed. Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.