Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Public Service Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The appellant Railroad Company seeks a reversal of the commission’s order for the reasons: (1) That it, is unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record; (2) because the findings, inferences, and conclusions of the commission are contrary to the railroad’s constitutional rights and privileges; and (3) further because they are arbitrary and capricious.

Sec. 227.20 (1), (2), Stats., provides:

“(1) The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury and shall be confined to the record, . . . The court may affirm the decision of the agency, or may reverse or modify it if…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Olson v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council of the City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hixon v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION OF NICOLET HS DIST. v. Nicolet Ed. Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API