Legal Opinion

People v. Madrigal

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2011No. 110194PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Gar-man, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Defendant, Claudia Madrigal, was indicted in the circuit court of Kane County on one count of identity theft in violation of section 16G — 15(a)(7) of the Identity Theft Law (720 ILCS 5/16G — 15(a)(7) (West 2008)). Section 16G — 15(a)(7) provides that “[a] person commits the offense of identity theft when he or she knowingly *** uses any personal identification information or personal identification document of another for the purpose of gaining access to any record of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. AguilarIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Wilson v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. RelerfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. HollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API