Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Tate & Lyle PLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2011No. 1100404PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALONE,

Chief Justice.

Tate & Lyle Sucralose, Inc. (“TLS”), petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Washington Circuit Court to vacate its December 1, 2010, order denying TLS’s motion to dismiss and to enter an order dismissing as time-barred the negligence and wantonness claims asserted by William C. Anderson, Jr., against TLS. We conclude that Anderson failed to exercise due diligence in ascertaining TLS’s identity and that that failure bars his attempt to amend his complaint to substitute TLS for a fictitiously named defendant so as to avoid the application of the statute…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. McKenzie v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Boyce v. CasseseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pynes v. Jackson HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  2. Barrett v. RomanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Dulin v. Northeast Alabama Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Beddingfield v. Mullins Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Beddingfield v. Mullins Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API