Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon v. Maryman

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided April 29, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00584Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SAFECO INSURANCE CIVIL ACTION COMPANY OF OREGON VERSUS 23-584-SDD-SDJ JULIE NEAL MARYMAN AND JAMES MARYMAN RULING This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment1 by Plaintiff, Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon (“Safeco”). Defendants, Julie Neal Maryman and James Maryman (the “Marymans”), have filed an Opposition2 to this motion, to which Safeco filed a Reply.3 For the following reasons, the Court finds that Safeco’s motion should be granted. I. LOCAL RULES AND EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS A. Local Rules – Statements of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API