Legal Opinion

Doe v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 12, 1997PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

On November 19, 1996, a judge in the Superior Court entered an order preliminarily enjoining the Commonwealth, its agents, employees, and representatives “from enforcing, implementing and complying with any and all provisions of St. 1996, Chapter 239” as to the plaintiff. Chapter 239 of the Acts of 1996, entitled “An Act relative to sex offender registration and community notification,” added §§ 178C through 1780 to G. L. c. 6 (sex offender act). The defendants have appealed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, second par., and we transferred the appeal here. We shall direct that the order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. T & D Video, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. McDonald v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Connery v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. Lukes v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. HendricksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. Connor C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. MogelinskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API