Legal Opinion

Meth v. Broad Street & Bonded Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1943No. Appeal, 156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This appeal is from an order refusing to take off a compulsory nonsuit. Plaintiff sued in assumpsit to recover $6,446.25, the withdrawal value of her stock in defendant building and loan association. In support of her claim, she testified that from 1915 to 1935 she had been in defendant’s employ in charge of its books and records; that she owned stock in defendant association; that on April 28, 1931, she gave written notice of intention to withdraw which was duly recorded on the withdrawal list; and that defendant later paid out in excess of $44,000 to shareholders…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Brown v. Victor Building Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. BatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Gorges v. Greater Adelphi Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Allegheny & Eastern Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Perletto v. Lancaster Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Babcock v. Wilderness Club, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1979
  5. Oakley v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life InsurancePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API