Oakley v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life Insurance
Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Winnet, J.,
— Who has the burden of proof? The decision of the case turns on the answer to this question.
The suit by plaintiff is on a life insurance policy. The only fact in issue is whether plaintiff is the beneficiary of the policy. At the trial of the case the question was raised by paragraphs 5 and 6 of the statement of claim and the corresponding paragraphs in the affidavit of defense.* In substance plaintiff stated that the insured, *639through John F. Steele, an agent of defendant, executed a change of beneficiary form naming her as the beneficiary under the policy. The affidavit of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fazio v. Pittsburgh Railways CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- O'Neill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Herrod v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Carl v. Grand Union Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Glou v. Security Benefit Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.