Legal Opinion

Badeen v. Par, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2014No. Docket 147150PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

As long as there have been debts, there have been people tasked with collecting them. To regulate the collection industry in Michigan, the Legislature passed a licensing requirement in 1980. This statutory package required collection agencies to obtain licenses and included statutes governing licensees’ permissible actions throughout the collection process.

For many years, the collection industry involved two players: the creditors and the collection agents that they hired to collect debts. But in the late 1990s, as the collection industry evolved, a middleman emerged. These middlemen — known…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jesperson v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People of Michigan v. Alonzo CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Arabo v. Michigan Gaming Control BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Hanton v. Hantz Financial Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API