Legal Opinion

Romer, O'Connor & Co. v. Huffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1959No. Civ. 18161PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order which set aside the entry of a default by the clerk and a default judgment entered thereon by the court. It is urged that the trial court abused its discretion in granting such relief under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

At the outset the plaintiff-appellant contends that the motion of the defendant as filed on April 12, 1957, sought only that the default judgment be set aside and not the default which had been entered by the clerk and, hence, the court erred and abused its discretion in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Stegge v. WilkersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API