Legal Opinion

State v. Tisdale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

INDICTMENT for tbe sale of spirituous liquor in prohibited territory, tried before Neal, J., and a jury, at June Term, 1901, of tbe Superior Court of ObaveN County. There was a verdict of guilty. Erom tbe judgment rendered defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

It is unnecessary to consider any of tbe exceptions taken by tbe defendant on tbe trial, as bis exception to tbe bill of indictment is well taken, and tbe motion to arrest tbe judgment must be allowed. Tbe first count charges tbe unlawful sale of liquor, without a license, to some person to tbe jurors unknown, in violation of tbe general law. Tbe second count charges tbe unlawful sale to some person to tbe jurors unknown, within territory wherein tbe sale of liquor is wholly prohibited by law. Tbe third count is as follows: “Tbe jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do further…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . StameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. State v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. State v. . PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API