Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 2017No. CR-17-198PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCourtney Hudson Goodson, Associate Justice

11Appellant Fred Lee Williams brings this appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of his pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis. 1 Williams argues that the writ should have been issued because the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), suborned perjury and breached the agreement he entered into with the State before entering a plea of guilty by not disclosing to the defense certain statements to the police and concealing the testimony of a witness at a trial in another case. 2 He further argues that the trial court erred | ¡.by treating his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Shequitqa L. Joiner v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Eddie L. Pugh v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. People v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API