Legal Opinion

Henington v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 2018No. CR-10-6PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice

Petitioner Danny Henington brings a second petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis. This court denied his first such petition in 2017. Henington v. State , 2017 Ark. 111, 515 S.W.3d 577 (per curiam), reh'g denied (May 4, 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 340, 199 L.Ed.2d 227 (2017). In the petition, Henington contends that the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense *521before trial and that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence. As we find no merit to the allegations and further find that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Danny Ray Henington v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Ray Dansby v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Eddie L. Pugh v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Willie Hutcherson v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. John Richard Lukach v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API