Legal Opinion

Goins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 2018No. CR-94-678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice

Petitioner Jesse Goins brings this petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court so that he may file a petition for writ of error coram nobis in his criminal case and a motion for appointment of counsel. In the petition, Goins contends that the trial court and the State violated *874Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to disclose that a juror was biased.1 As Goins's claim does not establish a ground for the writ, the petition is denied. The denial of the petition renders the motion for appointment of counsel moot.

I. Nature of the Writ

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Makkali v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Shequitqa L. Joiner v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API