Legal Opinion
A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Macomber & Whyte Rope Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided December 18, 1905No. 27,001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of trade-mark and for unfair competition.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.
Complainant files this bill to restrain the use by defendant of complainant’s registered trade-mark, No. 35,552, issued December 4, 1900, and to enjoin unfair competition in trade. Complainant and defendant both are manufacturers of wire rope. Complainant is a Missouri corporation. Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois. Proofs have been taken and the cause is now before the court on final hearing.
There is doubt, in view of the opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Warner v. Searle & Hereth Co., 191 U. S. 195, 24 Sup. Ct. 79, 48 L. Ed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Warner v. Searle & Hereth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Philadelphia Novelty Manuf'g Co. v. RoussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
- Dodge Mfg. Co. v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samson Cordage Works v. Puritan Cordage MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- In re Johns-Manville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- In re Gotham Silk Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927