Legal Opinion

Dodge Mfg. Co. v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided July 5, 1898No. 844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

Since 1886, or thereabouts, the complainant has twisted a blue thread into one of the strands of the so-called “transmission rope” which it manufactures. In 1888 it registered as a trade-mark a colored thread so twisted. This registration had no legal effect except to indicate that the complainant then claimed the trade-mark set forth in its application. A colored thread of some sort twisted in the rope is, evidently, almost or quite the only possible way of marking or identifying the rope itself, and it is in evidence that a colored thread has been commonly used for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Samson Cordage Works v. Puritan Cordage MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Macomber & Whyte Rope Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905
  3. Lufkin Rule Co. v. Master Rule Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API