Legal Opinion

Parker v. Bank of America, NA

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 16, 2011No. 111838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, Thomas P., J.

For the reasons that follow, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as more fully set out in the Order below.

FACTS

This is a dispute between a borrower/mortgagor and the lender and servicing company which made and have serviced (respectively) her mortgage loan. The Complaint is in ten counts, as follows:

1. Fraud;

2. Negligence;

3. Chapter 93A;

4. Breach of Contract;

5. Unjust Enrichment;

6. Truth in Lending Act;

7. Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act;

8. Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act;

9. Massachusetts Consumer Credit Cost Disclosure…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinson v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In re Hinson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. David M. Fasano v. Rbs Citizens & AnotherMassachusetts Superior Court · 2020
  3. Laguer v. OneWest Bank, FSBMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
  4. Waithaka v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API