Rodriguez v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Anthony Edward Rodriguez appeals his convictions for Rape,1 a class A felony and Criminal Confinement,2 a class B felony. Specifically, Rodriguez maintains that the enhancement of both offenses by the same eclement-use of a deadly weapon-violates double jeopardy prohibitions under the Indiana Constitution and that two instances of prosecu-torial misconduct denied him the right to a fair trial and constituted reversible error. Concluding that there was no double jeopardy violation and that the admonishment the trial judge administered to the jury…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Bald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Chubb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Akheem J. Purnell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.