Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2003No. 45A03-0211-CR-393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Anthony Edward Rodriguez appeals his convictions for Rape,1 a class A felony and Criminal Confinement,2 a class B felony. Specifically, Rodriguez maintains that the enhancement of both offenses by the same eclement-use of a deadly weapon-violates double jeopardy prohibitions under the Indiana Constitution and that two instances of prosecu-torial misconduct denied him the right to a fair trial and constituted reversible error. Concluding that there was no double jeopardy violation and that the admonishment the trial judge administered to the jury…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Chubb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Akheem J. Purnell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API