Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2003No. 35S00-0107-CR-324PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

In this direct criminal appeal, LeVohn Brown appeals his conviction for murder and requests a new trial on the basis that the prosecutor's closing arguments included what he contends was improper reference to Indiana's statutory penalty scheme. Because there was no request for an admonishment or motion for mistrial, the issue is foreclosed on direct appeal. Therefore, Brown contends this incident constituted fundamental error. We hold that it did not, and affirm the conviction.

Factual and Procedural Background

Throughout the day on Friday, February 4, 2000, LeVohn Brown…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lopez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Isaacs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Delarosa v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Pittman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API