Legal Opinion
David L. Dixon v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 26, 1993No. 92-3478PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner David L. Dixon petitions for review of an arbitrator’s award denying his grievance that he was improperly removed from his position with the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT’s”) Federal Aviation Administration (“agency”) for having altered, adulterated, or substituted a urine sample during a random drug test. 1 Because we conclude that the arbitrator’s award is not supported by substantial evidence, we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
Following his removal, petitioner filed a timely grievance in accordance with the terms of the labor relations agreement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- De Cicco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Todd R. Haebe v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Peoples v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Joycelyn Jacobs v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Richard Frank v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.