Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Hamil

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1954No. 39,427PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

Plaintiff instituted an action against Hal R. Hamil and the St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage. The defendant Hamil is not involved in this appeal. The other defendant appeals from an order overruling its general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. The material portion of the petition, in substance, alleged:

On December 2, 1952, plaintiff was traveling in a westerly direction on East Thirteenth street in the city of Wichita to a point where the St. Louis and San Francisco…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Richards v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Smith v. Mead Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Fraser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Hickert v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Green v. HigbeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Bick v. Peat Marwick & MainCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. LCL, LLC v. FalenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API