Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

After a full evidentiary hearing, a Hearing Panel found appellant guilty of violation of certain provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility promulgated as Rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Tennessee and containing the ethical standards relating to the practice of law and its administration. Appellant was ordered to be suspended from practice for sixty days.

It is not necessary here to delineate in detail the evidence, which is uncontradicted. Appellant was cited for scurrilous and improper language in briefs which he himself filed, the authorship…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barger v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ward v. University of the SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Dupree v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Inman v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ables v. FonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. SlavinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY v. Larry Edward PARRISHTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  3. R. Sadler Bailey v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Loring E. Justice v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API