Legal Opinion

Carpenson v. Najarian

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1967No. Civ. 732PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.

This appeal concerns the priority of trust deeds pertaining to the same parcel of real property. The facts are somewhat involved, but are essentially as follows: In September 1958, appellants George R. Carpenson and Emma L. Carpenson sold a parcel of vacant land, hereinafter referred to as the Mario Motel property, to Karl Reichert and others; as part of the purchase price the Carpensons took a promissory note in the amount of $60,000 secured by a deed of trust. This trust deed, hereafter referred to as the Reichert Trust Deed, provided for automatic subordination to future construction loans…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gluskin v. Atlantic Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Nevada Aggregates & Asphalt Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McCoy v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API