Legal Opinion

Burke v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1910No. Gen. No. 14,928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Marcus Kavanagh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This appeal is prosecuted to reverse a judgement of the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000 damages for personal injuries alleged to have Been sustained as a result of being struck by one of the defendant’s electric street cars at or near the intersection of South Halsted ■ and Thirty-seventh streets in the city of Chicago, on-March 7, 1904.

The declaration contains three counts.

The negligence averred in the first count of the declaration is that while plaintiff was crossing South Halsted street at its intersection with Thirty-seventh street, with all due care and caution for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. BatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prill v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Bushman v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  3. Ohnesorge v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Binder v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Myhre v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API