Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Berner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1942No. 28849PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover compensation for personal injuries to Hazel Brewer and damages to an automobile driven by her and owned by plaintiffs, the injuries and damages being sustained in collision with an automobile driven by the defendant Harry Paul Berner, Jr.

Plaintiffs allege that defendant Harry Paul Berner, Jr., employee and agent of defendant Star Machinery Co., was negligent prior to and at the time of the accident in failing to keep any lookout in the direction in which he was proceeding, to yield the right of way across an intersection, to sound any warning of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trevillian v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Chaar v. McLoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Jackson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Osborn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gray v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API