Legal Opinion
Starr v. Mooslin
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1971No. Civ. 35801PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*991Opinion
HERNDON, Acting P. J.
Statement of the Case
Defendant and appellant Carl J. Mooslin, an attorney at law, appeals from the judgment awarding plaintiff damages in this action for legal malpractice. Plaintiff Elena Starr charged that as the result of defendant’s negligence in representing her in a transaction involving a sale of real property, she suffered damages in the sum of $50,000. The judgment against defendant in the amount of $42,000 was entered upon the verdict of a jury. Defendant also appeals from the order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Statement of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Constance B. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Wright v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Banerian v. O'MALLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.