Bruce Stupy, for Himself and for Others Similarly Situated v. United States Postal Service, the National Rural Letter Carriers Association
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Bruce Stupy brought this class action under section 1006 of the Postal Reorganization Act (“PRA”), 39 U.S.C. §§ 101-5605, to challenge the Postal Service’s policy of providing an entry-level wage to letter carriers voluntarily reassigned from urban to rural areas. The district court dismissed the claim against the Postal Service on the ground that the PRA, 39 U.S.C. § 1006, does not confer a private right of action. The district court granted summary judgment on the breach of contract claim under 39 U.S.C. § 1208(b) against the National Rural Letter Carriers Association…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bureerong v. UvawasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Frazier v. International Longshoremen's Union Local No. 10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Bloom v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- East v. Bullock's Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.