Legal Opinion

McDonnel v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 8, 1946No. 9070PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon his trial before a jury in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, Daniel A. McDonnel was convicted of violating the Mann Act, § 398, Title 18, U.S.C.A. He appeals from an order which denied his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The appellant said he had learned after his trial that oppressive police methods had extorted false testimony from the prosecuting witness which she would repudiate at another hearing. In support of this ground McDonnel filed the affidavit of one Dough-erty which set forth that the girl had informed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Heard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Woody v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. Orson G. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. Packard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API