Legal Opinion

Heard v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1968No. 4344PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FICKLING, Associate Judge:

On January 3, 1966, appellant was arrested at his home for the offense of abortion. After placing him under arrest, the officers searched the premises pursuant to a valid search warrant and found certain abortion instruments, a sawed-off shotgun, and a pistol. The weapons were not described in the search warrant, nor did the officers at the time of the seizure know that the pistol was stolen. When the officers learned the pistol had been stolen, appellant was charged with receiving stolen property in violation of D.C. Code 1961, § 22-2205, and was convicted at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Palmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. McDonnel v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. O'BRYANT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Sellars v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Doepel v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Busey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Godfrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API