Legal Opinion
State v. Tinsley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 17, 1998No. AC 16992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4),1 and commission of a class A, B or C felony with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53-202k.2
*718The defendant claims that (1) it was constitutionally impermissible to convict him of robbery in the first degree because there was insufficient evidence to establish that he was guilty of one of the two alleged alternative methods of committing the crime and (2) the trial court improperly denied his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CooperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. FaulknerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. LatorreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. NievesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. AponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.