Legal Opinion
Jose Trujillo v. SSSC, Inc., et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 2, 2026No. 1:21-cv-01691Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 JOSE TRUJILLO, No. 1:21-cv-01691-KES-FRS 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 16 SSSC, INC., et al., 17 Defendants. (Doc. 82) 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff Jose Trujillo asserts that he was denied his right of access to defendants’ 24 businesses under the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Unruh Act, and California’s 25 Health and Safety Code § 19955(a). Doc. 81 (“SAC”). Defendant SSSC, Inc. (“SSSC”) moves 26 to dismiss, or in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Doc. 82.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.