Ropat Corp. v. McGraw-Edison Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McLAREN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendant, Marshall Field & Co., for summary judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.
This action involves alleged infringement of U.S. Letters Patent No. 3,611,910 (’910), a corn popper. (For a complete discussion of the patent, see this Court’s prior opinion, Ropat Corp. v. West Bend Co., 382 F.Supp. 1030 (N.D.Ill. [Ropat I] 1974). The defendant claims that the utility ’910 patent is invalid because of double patenting, created by the prior award of Design…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Luke Thorington, Gerald Schiazzano and Joel ShurganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re DuboisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- In re SwettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Ropat Corp. v. West Bend Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- ROPAT CORPORATION v. McGraw-Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975